Current:Home > StocksThe White House is threatening the patents of high-priced drugs developed with taxpayer dollars -Prime Capital Blueprint
The White House is threatening the patents of high-priced drugs developed with taxpayer dollars
TradeEdge View
Date:2025-04-11 11:19:22
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration is putting pharmaceutical companies on notice, warning them that if the price of certain drugs is too high, the government might cancel their patent protection and allow rivals to make their own versions.
Under a plan announced Thursday, the government would consider overriding the patent for high-priced drugs that have been developed with the help of taxpayer money and letting competitors make them in hopes of driving down the cost.
In a 15-second video released to YouTube on Wednesday night, President Joe Biden promised the move would lower prices.
“Today, we’re taking a very important step toward ending price gouging so you don’t have to pay more for the medicine you need,” he said.
The administration did not immediately release details about how the process will work and how it will deem a drug costly enough to act. White House officials would not name drugs that might potentially be targeted.
There will be a 60-day public comment period. If the plan is enacted, drugmakers are almost certain to challenge it in court.
It’s the latest health policy pitch from a White House gearing up to make its efforts to tackle drug prices a central theme in next year’s reelection campaign. Biden frequently talks about the $35 cap on insulin for Medicare enrollees that went into effect this year, as well as a plan for government officials to negotiate some drug prices paid by Medicare for the first time in history.
The federal government, however, has never taken such a move against patents, a step called “march-in rights.” But some Democratic lawmakers, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, has in recent years lobbied the Health and Human Services agency to do so with certain drugs.
The conditions for how those “march-in rights” would be used have long been debated. Pharmaceutical companies have pushed back on the idea that prices alone are enough for Washington to act against a drug’s patent. The process proposed by the administration would clarify that the drug’s patent could be in jeopardy if its price is out of reach for Americans, White House officials said.
“For the first time, ever, the high price of that taxpayer-funded drug is a factor in determining that the drug is not accessible to the public on reasonable terms,” said Biden domestic policy adviser Neera Tanden.
The plan could threaten future drugs, according to the pharmaceutical lobbying firm Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA.
“This would be yet another loss for American patients who rely on public-private sector collaboration to advance new treatments and cures,” PhRMA spokesperson Megan Van Etten said.
Pharmaceutical companies have long relied on government research to develop new drugs. The most recent major breakthrough was the development of COVID-19 vaccines. U.S. taxpayers invested billions of dollars in the effort and were able, until recently, to access treatments and preventions for the virus without paying out-of-pocket for them.
When the public invests heavily in a private company’s drug, it’s fair to question whether they should have to pay high prices for it, said William Pierce, a former HHS official during President George W. Bush’s administration.
“The question becomes – what reward should there be for the taxpayers who help fund this product?” Pierce said.
veryGood! (697)
Related
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- Why Taylor Swift's Music Is Temporarily Banned From Philadelphia Radio Station
- Shapiro says unfinished business includes vouchers, more school funding and higher minimum wage
- Closer than we have been to deal between Hamas and Israel on hostage release, White House official says
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- NFL Week 11 winners, losers: Broncos race back to relevance with league-best win streak
- New Mexico makes interim head of state’s struggling child welfare agency its permanent leader
- Stocks and your 401(k) may surge now that Fed rate hikes seem to be over, history shows
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Georgia jumps Michigan for No. 1 spot in college football NCAA Re-Rank 1-133
Ranking
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Joe Flacco signs with Browns, but team sticking with rookie QB Thompson-Robinson for next start
- More free COVID-19 tests can be ordered now, as uptick looms
- Remains found in Arizona desert in 1992 identified as missing girl; police investigate possible link to serial killer
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Police say shooter attacked Ohio Walmart and injuries reported
- Below Deck Mediterranean Shocker: Stew Natalya Scudder Exits Season 8 Early
- Chase Chrisley Debuts New Romance 4 Months After Emmy Medders Breakup
Recommendation
Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
California male nanny sentenced to over 700 years for sexual assaulting, filming young boys
Sheetz gas prices for Thanksgiving week: $1.99 a gallon deal being offered to travelers
NBA power rankings: Sacramento Kings rolling with six straight wins, climbing in West
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
Why Taylor Swift Is Missing the Chiefs vs. Eagles Game
After trying to buck trend, newspaper founded with Ralph Nader’s succumbs to financial woes
Years after Parkland massacre, tour freshens violence for group of House lawmakers