Current:Home > ContactGeorgia Republicans say religious liberty needs protection, but Democrats warn of discrimination -Prime Capital Blueprint
Georgia Republicans say religious liberty needs protection, but Democrats warn of discrimination
View
Date:2025-04-17 13:15:24
ATLANTA (AP) — Georgia Republicans are voting to protect religious rights from being trampled by state and local governments, while Democrats warn that the long-disputed measure opens the door for people and groups to discriminate against LGBTQ+ people in the name of religion.
The Senate voted 33-19 for Senate Bill 180 on Thursday, sending it to the House for more debate.
It’s a new flareup in an old debate in Georgia, where lawmakers eight years ago passed a different version of the measure. Then-Gov. Nathan Deal, a Republican, vetoed it in 2016 under pressure from members of the business community who said they feared it would hurt their ability to attract employees and tourists.
This time around the measure is being pushed in an election year when all lawmakers are up for reelection and Republican leaders have become more conservative.
The bill mirrors a 1993 federal law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which says that a government must show a compelling interest to force someone to go against their sincerely held religious beliefs and, when it does so, must use the least restrictive means possible.
Republican Sen. Ed Setzler of Acworth said Georgia needs its own religious protection bill because the federal law doesn’t protect against attacks on religion by state and local governments. That means a local government might deny things like permission to distribute religious literature or a zoning permit for a church without giving enough deference to religious freedom, supporters say.
“It simply makes the government pause and think, do we have a compelling interest in this, and if we do, are we accommodating people’s religious faith in every way possible,” Setzler said.
Opponents warn that people and private groups will use the law to do things like deny birth control coverage to their employees, and that the legislation could blow holes in local laws that ban discrimination.
“We are one of only three states in the nation that don’t have an anti-discrimination law,” said Sen. Kim Jackson, a Stone Mountain Democrat. “We don’t have protections set in place if someone tries to abuse this law.”
Jackson, who is lesbian, also said she fears more personal repercussions: that she could be denied service at her adopted son’s daycare, for example, or a room at a hotel or even towing service if broken down at the side of the road. In some cases she might win a lawsuit later, Jackson said, but she — and others — stand to suffer in the meantime.
“Legislation like this is an invitation. It’s an invitation to Georgians to consider how they want to discriminate. It’s a permission slip,” Jackson said. “If there is anyone who you love, when people look at them, they think they’re different than the norm, this legislation puts them at risk.”
Opponents also say the law could be bad for the economy by driving out LGBTQ+ residents and companies that employ them. The Metro Atlanta Chamber and the Georgia Chamber of Commerce released a joint statement opposing the measure, saying that after decades of promoting Georgia as a destination for business, the bill “would undermine the state’s strong reputation we have built together.”
Setzler, a longtime supporter of the measure, calls such fears overblown.
“Never has a RFRA statute been used to back up invidious discrimination,” he said, adding that the law would be applied on a case-by-case basis without any prejudgments.
Christian conservative groups celebrated the bill’s forward movement after years of little progress.
“This development is a profound statement that Georgia values and safeguards the right of its citizens to practice their faith without fear of government overreach,” said Cole Muzio, the president of Frontline Policy, a conservative group close to Republican Gov. Brian Kemp.
veryGood! (17622)
Related
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- MTV News shut down as Paramount Global cuts 25% of its staff
- Rediscovered Reports From 19th-Century Environmental Volunteers Advance the Research of Today’s Citizen Scientists in New York
- Great Scott! 30 Secrets About Back to the Future Revealed
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- In BuzzFeed fashion, 5 takeaways from Ben Smith's 'Traffic'
- Analysis: Fashion Industry Efforts to Verify Sustainability Make ‘Greenwashing’ Easier
- Coach 4th of July Deals: These Handbags Are Red, White and Reduced 60% Off
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Study Identifies Outdoor Air Pollution as the ‘Largest Existential Threat to Human and Planetary Health’
Ranking
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Shoppers Say This Large Beach Blanket from Amazon is the Key to a Hassle-Free, Sand-Free Beach Day
- A Dream of a Fossil Fuel-Free Neighborhood Meets the Constraints of the Building Industry
- Tracking the impact of U.S.-China tensions on global financial institutions
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Ahead of COP27, New Climate Reports are Warning Shots to a World Off Course
- In North Carolina Senate Race, Global Warming Is On The Back Burner. Do Voters Even Care?
- Fifty Years After the UN’s Stockholm Environment Conference, Leaders Struggle to Realize its Vision of ‘a Healthy Planet’
Recommendation
Sam Taylor
Fox isn't in the apology business. That could cost it a ton of money
An EPA proposal to (almost) eliminate climate pollution from power plants
Hurry to Charlotte Tilbury's Massive Summer Sale for 40% Off Deals on Pillow Talk, Flawless Filter & More
Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
How to fight a squatting goat
Bachelor Nation's Jason Tartick Shares How He and Kaitlyn Bristowe Balance Privacy in the Public Eye
‘Last Gasp for Coal’ Saw Illinois Plants Crank up Emission-Spewing Production Last Year