Current:Home > MarketsNebraska’s new law limiting abortion and trans healthcare is argued before the state Supreme Court -Prime Capital Blueprint
Nebraska’s new law limiting abortion and trans healthcare is argued before the state Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-27 23:52:59
Members of the Nebraska Supreme Court appeared to meet with skepticism a state lawyer’s defense of a new law that combines a 12-week abortion ban with another measure to limit gender-affirming health care for minors.
Assistant Attorney General Eric Hamilton argued Tuesday that the hybrid law does not violate a state constitutional requirement that legislative bills stick to a single subject. But he went further, stating that the case is not one the high court should rule on because it is politically charged and lawmaking is within the sole purview of the Legislature.
“Didn’t that ship sail about 150 years ago?” Chief Justice Mike Heavican retorted.
Hamilton stood firm, insisting the lawsuit presented a “nonjusticiable political question” and that the Legislature “self-polices” whether legislation holds to the state constitution’s single-subject rule.
“This court is allowed to review whether another branch has followed the constitutionally established process, isn’t it?” Justice John Freudenberg countered.
The arguments came in a lawsuit brought last year by the American Civil Liberties Union representing Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, contending that the hybrid law violates the one-subject rule. Lawmakers added the abortion ban to an existing bill dealing with gender-related care only after a proposed six-week abortion ban failed to defeat a filibuster.
The law was the Nebraska Legislature’s most controversial last session, and its gender-affirming care restrictions triggered an epic filibuster in which a handful of lawmakers sought to block every bill for the duration of the session — even ones they supported — in an effort to stymie it.
A district judge dismissed the lawsuit in August, and the ACLU appealed.
ACLU attorney Matt Segal argued Tuesday that the abortion segment of the measure and the transgender health care segment dealt with different subjects, included different titles within the legislation and even had different implementation dates. Lawmakers only tacked on the abortion ban to the gender-affirming care bill after the abortion bill had failed to advance on its own, he said.
Segal’s argument seemed based more on the way the Legislature passed the bill than on whether the bill violates the single-subject law, Justice William Cassel remarked.
But Justice Lindsey Miller-Lerman noted that the high court in 2020 blocked a ballot initiative seeking to legalize medical marijuana after finding it violated the state’s single-subject rule. The court found the initiative’s provisions to allow people to use marijuana and to produce it were separate subjects.
If producing medical marijuana and using it are two different topics, how can restricting abortion and transgender health care be the same subject, she asked.
“What we’ve just heard are attempts to shoot the moon,” Segal said in a rebuttal, closing with, “These are two passing ships in the night, and all they have in common is the sea.”
The high court will make a ruling on the case at a later date.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Man takes murder plea deal in first Colorado case impacted by work of embattled DNA analyst
- At 93 years old, Willie Mays has added 10 more hits to his MLB record. Here's why.
- Top baby names 2024: Solar eclipse, women athletes inspire parents, Baby Center data shows
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Mistrial declared for man charged with using a torch to intimidate at white nationalist rally
- Virginia authorities search for woman wanted in deaths of her 3 roommates
- Ex-NJ attorney general testifies Sen. Bob Menendez confronted him twice over a pending criminal case
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- Robinhood to acquire Bitstamp crypto exchange in $200 million deal
Ranking
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Fiona Harvey files $170M lawsuit against Netflix for alleged 'Baby Reindeer' portrayal
- The ACLU is making plans to fight Trump’s promises of immigrant raids and mass deportations
- Analysis: This NBA Finals will show if the Celtics are ready for pressure
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- How to watch Pat Sajak's final 'Wheel of Fortune' episode: TV channel, air date, more
- 17-year-old boy student in Seattle high school parking lot, authorities say
- A new Nebraska law makes court diversion program available to veterans. Other states could follow
Recommendation
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
Get Starbucks delivered: Coffee giant announces new partnership with GrubHub
Robinhood to acquire Bitstamp crypto exchange in $200 million deal
How to watch Pat Sajak's final 'Wheel of Fortune' episode: TV channel, air date, more
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
A new Nebraska law makes court diversion program available to veterans. Other states could follow
Kansas City Chiefs cancel practice after backup defensive lineman BJ Thompson has medical emergency
Dolly Parton announces new Broadway musical 'Hello, I'm Dolly,' hitting the stage in 2026